David Kanter (dkanter@realworldtech.com) on 10/5/09 wrote:
---------------------------
>AM (myname4rwt@jee.male) on 10/5/09 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>David Kanter (dkanter@realworldtech.com) on 10/5/09 wrote:
>>---------------------------
>>>AM (myname4rwt@jee.male) on 10/4/09 wrote:
>>>---------------------------
>>>>Ungo (a@b.c.d.e) on 10/3/09 wrote:
>>>>---------------------------
>>>>>AM (myname4rwt@jee.male) on 10/3/09 wrote:
>>>>>---------------------------
>>>>>>Ungo (a@b.c.d.e) on 10/2/09 wrote:
>>>>>>>Do I have exact sales figures? No, and I never claimed to, nor did I invent any.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Really?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>But if you're looking for the most common Atom bin by number of
>>>>>>>>>>>chips shipped to date, that would be the N270
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Try harder, "ungo".
>>>>>
>>>>>That's not even a very good troll. Where's the exact figure in my statement?
>>>>
>>>>Since you state which Atom sold most chips, I want to see >the source. Or are you that all-knowing Oracle?
>>>
>>>Don't be a twit. You're assuming that because the pricing isn't listed on Intel's
>>>site that it somehow means it isn't available.
>>
>>No. My understanding is that if an item is not on Intel's >current price list, it's not generally available.
>
>That sure sounds like an assumption even stranger than the one Ungo is making...his
>is at least backed up by real observations.
>
>Perhaps before assuming that ark.intel.com is the best metric of availability, you should try checking real sources.

Check Intel's price list, Z atoms are not to be found there either, only 230, 330 and N270.

>>Apparently, if you're a company like Dell, you can get the >part(s) nonetheless.
>>But are those Z Atoms available to anyone who can pay? >Doubt it.
>
>Wow, that sounds like totally ironclad proof that the z-series atom's are unavailable - 'you doubt it'.

No need to evade: are Z atoms generally available or just for Dell and a few others?

>David