you missread me

Article: Computational Efficiency in Modern Processors
By: ? (0xe2.0x9a.0x9b.delete@this.gmail.com), November 12, 2009 1:18 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
MoTheG (better@not.tell) on 11/12/09 wrote:
---------------------------
>? (0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@gmail.com) on 11/11/09 wrote:
>>- how many percent GCC spends doing IO? What is "GCC's IO" anyway?
>
>That certainly depends very much on the project.

What is stopping you from posting an average, for example. "Depends on the project" is not a number. I was asking for a number, including a short description of the context in which it was measured.

Personally, I do not know how many percent does GCC spent doing "IO". I fully admit it. I am not hiding that I do not know the exact number. But, you are hiding it - instead of writing back simple answer "I do not know" you replied with "it depends on the project".

>>- If you parallelize the parser
>
>I never suggested this. Read Potatoswatters reply, he understood, so I must have
>been lesser randomly and arbitrary than you read me.

You wrote (emphasis mine):

GCC itself should be parallizeable. For GCC I'm thinking parsing/IO could be a thread and many parts can be compiled seperatly just as I can precompile parts.

I thought that by "parallelizing something in itself" you mean to also parallelize parsing itself.

>>For example I am unsure whether you actually know what a Linux process is.
>
>I do know. I even know the difference between a program, a process and a thread. ("wow!")
>I'm getting the impression that you don't only want to save me from being a backseater/know-it-all
>with no realworld experience, but simply bully me.

Hmm.
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Article: Computational Efficiency in Modern Processors by DKMoTheG2009/11/08 07:02 AM
  Article: Computational Efficiency in Modern Processors by DKnone2009/11/08 07:15 AM
  Silverthorne and OoO vs. InOrdMoTheG2009/11/08 07:22 AM
    Silverthorne and OoO vs. InOrdDavid Kanter2009/11/08 04:11 PM
      Magical 100x speedupsAM2009/11/09 09:03 AM
        Magical 100x speedupsDavid Kanter2009/11/09 12:41 PM
          Magical 100x speedupsnone2009/11/09 01:36 PM
            Magical speedupsDavid Kanter2009/11/09 03:24 PM
              Magical speedupsnone2009/11/09 03:40 PM
              Hardware SpecsMS2009/11/09 05:49 PM
                44x faster than a single cpu coreVincent Diepeveen2009/11/10 08:17 AM
              Magical speedupsVincent Diepeveen2009/11/10 08:02 AM
          Xeon 130x speedup vs XeonEric Bron2009/11/10 08:20 AM
          Magical 100x speedupsAM2009/11/10 10:42 AM
            Magical 100x speedupsLinus Torvalds2009/11/10 01:19 PM
              Mega speedupsAM2009/11/11 06:21 AM
        Bogus 100x speedupsDavid Kanter2009/11/10 01:26 AM
          No speedups for CPUs for the general programming populaceMoTheG2009/11/10 05:26 AM
          Bogus 100x speedups?2009/11/10 05:45 AM
          Bogus 100x speedupshobold2009/11/10 07:31 AM
          Bogus 100x speedupsVincent Diepeveen2009/11/10 08:26 AM
          Bogus 100x speedupssylt2009/11/10 10:00 AM
          Bogus 100x speedupsAM2009/11/10 10:47 AM
      GPU vs. CPUMoTheG2009/11/09 11:30 AM
        GPU vs. CPUa reader2009/11/09 07:58 PM
          ease of programmingMoTheG2009/11/09 11:45 PM
            yes for GPU programming you need non-public infoVincent Diepeveen2009/11/10 08:36 AM
              yes for GPU programming you need non-public infoPotatoswatter2009/11/11 08:06 AM
                yes for GPU programming you need non-public infoVincent Diepeveen2009/11/11 11:23 AM
                  yes for GPU programming you need non-public infoPotatoswatter2009/11/11 01:26 PM
                  Real businesses use GPGPU.Jouni Osmala2009/11/11 11:00 PM
        GPU vs. CPU?2009/11/10 06:01 AM
          2. try but most is said, just clarifyingMoTheG2009/11/10 10:24 AM
            2. try but most is said, just clarifying?2009/11/11 01:11 AM
              you missread meMoTheG2009/11/12 12:33 AM
                you missread me?2009/11/12 01:18 AM
            2. try but most is said, just clarifyingPotatoswatter2009/11/11 08:22 AM
              2. try but most is said, just clarifying?2009/11/12 01:22 AM
                loose, not so orderlyMoTheG2009/11/12 12:47 PM
                  loose, not so orderlyPotatoswatter2009/11/12 06:50 PM
                2. try but most is said, just clarifyingrwessel2009/11/12 01:01 PM
                  2. try but most is said, just clarifyingGabriele Svelto2009/11/13 12:39 AM
                    2. try but most is said, just clarifying?2009/11/13 01:14 AM
                      2. try but most is said, just clarifyingGabriele Svelto2009/11/13 01:30 AM
                      2. try but most is said, just clarifyingrwessel2009/11/13 01:24 PM
                  2. try but most is said, just clarifyingMichael S2009/11/14 01:08 PM
                    2. try but most is said, just clarifyingGabriele Svelto2009/11/14 11:38 PM
                      2. try but most is said, just clarifyingAndi Kleen2009/11/15 01:19 AM
                      2. try but most is said, just clarifyingMichael S2009/11/15 01:58 AM
                        2. try but most is said, just clarifyingEric Bron2009/11/15 02:25 AM
                          /MP optionEric Bron2009/11/15 02:33 AM
                            /MP optionPaul2009/11/15 09:42 AM
                              /MP optionEric Bron2009/11/15 01:22 PM
                        2. try but most is said, just clarifying?2009/11/15 03:13 AM
                          2. try but most is said, just clarifyingMichael S2009/11/15 05:14 AM
                  2. try but most is said, just clarifyingEugene Nalimov2009/11/14 09:24 PM
    Atom pointAM2009/11/09 09:00 AM
      Atom TDPDavid Kanter2009/11/09 12:48 PM
        Atom TDPhobold2009/11/10 07:41 AM
        Atom TDPAM2009/11/10 10:49 AM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell avocado?