By: David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com),
Room: Moderated Discussions
slacker (s@lack.er) on 6/4/10 wrote:
---------------------------
>rwessel (robertwessel@yahoo.com) on 6/4/10 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>It's not totally impossible, but there's no support for it. It would certainly
>>be possible to use some C++ in a driver, with a few (not very difficult to write)
>>wrappers and shims, and with some restrictions on what C++ features you use. But
>>you won't get any such code checked in by the kernel maintainers (in fact it will likely be rejected out of hand).
>>
>>http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/lkml/#s15-3
>
>I thought someone might link to this instead:
>
>http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/57643/focus=57918
>>
You know, the funniest thing about that is that I almost react the same way when people talk with me about flat vs. threaded forums. OK - well honestly, I'm less abrasive.
Flat forums are kind of the opiate of the masses. Many flat forums have a high percentage of uninteresting and rather obnoxious discussions. Strangely enough most of those people seem to find our threaded forums 'intimidating', and they stay the hell away (so far). This keeps the quality of our discussions relatively higher...
So for the SAT analogy of the day:
C:C++ as threaded forums: ______ forums?
The answer is flat.
David
---------------------------
>rwessel (robertwessel@yahoo.com) on 6/4/10 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>It's not totally impossible, but there's no support for it. It would certainly
>>be possible to use some C++ in a driver, with a few (not very difficult to write)
>>wrappers and shims, and with some restrictions on what C++ features you use. But
>>you won't get any such code checked in by the kernel maintainers (in fact it will likely be rejected out of hand).
>>
>>http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/lkml/#s15-3
>
>I thought someone might link to this instead:
>
>http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/57643/focus=57918
>>
You know, the funniest thing about that is that I almost react the same way when people talk with me about flat vs. threaded forums. OK - well honestly, I'm less abrasive.
Flat forums are kind of the opiate of the masses. Many flat forums have a high percentage of uninteresting and rather obnoxious discussions. Strangely enough most of those people seem to find our threaded forums 'intimidating', and they stay the hell away (so far). This keeps the quality of our discussions relatively higher...
So for the SAT analogy of the day:
C:C++ as threaded forums: ______ forums?
The answer is flat.
David



